Arizona Trucking Association Expresses Deep Disappointment in Governor Hobbs’ Veto of SB1514
Bipartisan Legislation Would Have Restored Legal Certainty for Warehouse Workers and Employers
PHOENIX, AZ – The Arizona Trucking Association (ATA) expresses profound disappointment in Governor Katie Hobbs’ decision to veto SB1514, bipartisan legislation that would have restored critical legal protections for Arizona’s warehousing and logistics industry following a disruptive federal court ruling.
“Governor Hobbs’ veto is a missed opportunity to support both Arizona workers and businesses,” said Tony Bradley, President and CEO of the Arizona Trucking Association. “SB1514 represented months of good-faith collaboration to address a specific legal problem with a targeted solution.”
Arbitration has served as a cornerstone of American dispute resolution for centuries, formally enshrined in federal law through the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) since 1925. This time-tested mechanism has provided workers and employers with faster, more affordable alternatives to lengthy court battles, benefiting millions of Americans across all industries.
Regrettably, Governor Hobbs’ veto message fundamentally mischaracterizes both the purpose and impact of SB1514. Her claim that the bill would “enshrine forced arbitration” ignores the reality that arbitration agreements have been standard practice for nearly a century, with strong protections ensuring fairness for workers.
Industry leaders worked tirelessly with stakeholders, including labor representatives, to craft a narrowly tailored solution addressing only the specific legal gap created by the Ninth Circuit’s Ortiz decision. This ruling excluded certain warehouse workers from FAA coverage, creating uncertainty that affects thousands of Arizona jobs.
Notably, Arizona now stands alone among Ninth Circuit states in lacking statutory protection for employment arbitration agreements. Every other state in the circuit – California, Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Alaska, and Hawaii – maintains laws supporting these agreements under state authority.
Governor Hobbs’ decision effectively tells businesses considering Arizona for warehousing operations that they cannot rely on the same employment contract structures available in neighboring states. This places Arizona at a severe competitive disadvantage in attracting logistics and distribution investments.
Employers and employees across Arizona will now face increased costs and delays as workplace disputes move from efficient arbitration processes to overburdened court systems. What once took months to resolve may now take years, imposing financial hardship on workers seeking timely resolution of their claims.
Additionally, businesses that have operated successfully in Arizona for decades now face legal uncertainty about their existing employment agreements. The veto undermines contractual relationships that have served both workers and employers effectively, creating instability in an industry critical to Arizona’s economy.
Senators and Representatives from both parties recognized the importance of this legislation, passing SB1514 with bipartisan support: 18-12 in the Senate and 34-25 in the House. This broad coalition understood that legal certainty benefits all Arizonans.
Unfortunately, the Governor’s veto ignores the careful stakeholder process that produced meaningful worker protections in the final legislation, including explicit exemptions for union workers and requirements that employers bear the bulk of arbitration costs.
Certainly, businesses considering expansion in Arizona’s lucrative warehousing sector will now think twice about locating operations in a state where employment contract enforceability remains uncertain compared to more predictable legal environments in neighboring states.
Key provisions of the vetoed legislation included comprehensive worker protections. Workers would have retained full access to government agencies for filing complaints. Union members would have been entirely exempt from the bill’s arbitration provisions and would have continued resolving disputes through their union-negotiated arbitration processes. Employers, not employees, would have been required to cover all arbitration costs beyond the equivalent of a standard court filing fee. These carefully crafted amendments addressed every concern raised by labor representatives during the legislative process, while providing the legal certainty needed to keep Arizona competitive in the logistics industry.
SB1514’s defeat means Arizona workers will now face longer, more expensive dispute resolution processes while businesses encounter increased legal risks that could discourage job creation and economic investment in the state.
The Arizona Trucking Association remains committed to working with all stakeholders to find solutions that protect workers’ rights while maintaining the legal framework necessary for continued economic growth and job creation in Arizona’s vital logistics sector.
###